some people say involvement of youth in crimes in increasing at an alarming rate. give your opinion.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in number of people who believing that youth in crimes is increasing at an alarming rate. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that some people say involvement of youth in crimes in increasing at an alarming rate can not only contribute to youth in crimes is increasing at an alarming rate, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of some people say involvement of youth in crimes in increasing at an alarming rate.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of some people say involvement of youth in crimes in increasing at an alarming rate are indeed too great to ignore.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-01-08 | amolsharma44 | 72 | view |
- There days it is very common to have people from two different generation mix in the same workplace. Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant example. 11
- positive and negative effects of technology information through mass media 80
- animal rights are important 77
- Many people believe that it’s easy to learn something in a group rather than individually. Do you agree or disagree? 72
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THE PURPOSE OF EDUCATION IS TO PREPARE THE FUTURE WORKFORCE AND MAKES GOOD MEMBERS OF THE SOCIETY OTHERS THINK THE PURPOSE OF EDUCATION SHOULD LEED TO SELF FULFILLMENT 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80141843972 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81804920787 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496453900709 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0861429258 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.090909091 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427518752706 0.242375264174 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179946327367 0.0925447433944 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.240032636676 0.071462118173 336% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311702338102 0.151781067708 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096294493528 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80141843972 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81804920787 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496453900709 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0861429258 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.090909091 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427518752706 0.242375264174 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179946327367 0.0925447433944 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.240032636676 0.071462118173 336% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311702338102 0.151781067708 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096294493528 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.