In today’s society, when having access to tertiary education becomes a life-changing opportunity for many students, there are many contradictory opinions related to systems of university education raised between people. One of them is that it would be prominent if pupils participated in a wide spectrum of subjects rather than specified areas. Even though there are many underlying reasons for this argument, students are likely to be more well-cultivated with both practical skills and theoretical knowledge when focusing on their definite subjects.
On the one hand, learning different subjects may offer students a well-rounded education which helps them enhance career prospects in the future. Firstly, as can be seen, in this increasingly competitive society, current employers show a tendency to recruit postgraduates who can do a myriad of jobs within a single position. Furthermore, undergraduates who major in interdisciplinary studies are expected to be in a preponderant position. In fact, nowadays, a content creator is not only required to master the writing but also develop their interpersonal and team working skills. Additionally, a growing number of pupils intend to follow the career path which completely contrasts with their major at university. Therefore, having an acquaintance with various fields during university days brings plenty of benefits for youngsters in their job pursuit.
On the contrary, a high concentration of subjects related to pupils’ degree-specific is indicated to be more beneficial. In the first place, studying a particular field provides students with a deeper understanding of academic knowledge and seems inclined to be more active on a probationary period. In addition, numerous prestigious universities over the world such as the University of Oxford; as regards students’ majors, the university decided to classify them into a faculty or department. By doing so, students can take advantage of receiving support and guidance from an expert in their field.
All in all, although having touch with all subjects may help students to pursue better employment, it will be a positive result if pupils follow a single major.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Sudan Bhattarai
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...result if pupils follow a single major.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, as regards, in addition, in fact, such as, on the contrary, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1207.87684729 153% => OK
No of words: 332.0 242.827586207 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57530120482 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26081588489 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620481927711 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 379.143842365 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.007360742 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.214285714 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.25397266985 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143700795403 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491367759901 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343853290398 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906754093849 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446123470231 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.