The given bar chart depicts the proportion of owner-occupiers and lessees in the UK and Wales over 93 years. It is clear that the rate of renters significantly deflated, while the other dramatically crawled over a given period. Furthermore, prior to 1971, there were more lessees than ownerships. Thereafter, the reverse was true.
According to this bar, about more than 20% of the freeholders were in 1918. Nevertheless, not until this proportion began to rocket to 1971 did it become the same as that of the leaseholders, at 50%. Then, continuously, the percentage of owned residents who swelled and reached its peak was in 2001, at nearly 70 percent. Then, there was a small deflation which was roughly 65% in 2011.
On the other hand, there was approximately 75% of rented citizens in the beginning year of the given bar. Afterward, this slid significantly and hit a trough at about more than 30% in 2001. However, then, its rate which shot to between 30% and 40% was in the last year of the chart.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, then, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77586206897 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88513188529 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597701149425 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0857225053 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5454545455 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0707713109648 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255162807448 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253331780892 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0475676265833 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104403729892 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.