All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
The Author asserts that the company should focus on their employees feedbacks rather than hiring consultants to suggests ways of improving efficiency. I partly agree with this claim.
Employees are the most integral part of the company. Any policy changes that in a way affect employees also indirectly affects the company efficiency. Since the employees spends years working for the company they understand the company better than anyone else hence should be the first priority for any feedbacks or suggestions. Every company has an HR department that make policies to augment employees satisfaction which in a way augments overall company efficiency. For instance, A haughty boss is likely to witness more resignation from its emplyees which is will put stop on any ongoing projects affecting the overall company growth.
Employees that has been working for years for a particuler company consider the company has its second home. They can easily find out the reasons for poor efficiencies as they are experiencing themselves. A survey regarding what are employees expecting from the company and how they can make the company better place to work will help comapny make changes according to the employees needs. This will lower the number of resignation comapny is witnessing and emploees will give their 100% in their work resulting in increase efficiency.
However, I concede that the companies should not solely reliance on the employees feedback and should take second opinion from consultants. It might happen that employees suggestions might favour only them neglecting betterment of the company but priority should be given to emplyees suggestions.
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Bears are mammals of the family Ursidae Bears are classified as caniforms or doglike carnivorans with the pinnipeds being their closest living relatives Although there are only eight living species of bear they are widespread appearing in a wide variety o 73
- Bears are mammals of the family Ursidae Bears are classified as caniforms or doglike carnivorans with the pinnipeds being their closest living relatives Although there are only eight living species of bear they are widespread appearing in a wide variety o 78
- Bears are mammals of the family Ursidae Bears are classified as caniforms or doglike carnivorans with the pinnipeds being their closest living relatives Although there are only eight living species of bear they are widespread appearing in a wide variety o 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...anies should not solely reliance on the employees feedback and should take second opinion...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, regarding, second, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 58.6224719101 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 260.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41153846154 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74582792722 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2469881962 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.230769231 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338025751187 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123926926289 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774401614852 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208239043432 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457961263426 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.