Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Friends are an essential part of life. How to select true and righteous friends is a debatable topic. Some people think that having friends with the same mentality as yours is better rather than choosing friends with the differences in opinions. This essay will discuss both views in detail.
On the one hand, having friends with similar interests will have fewer conflicts. This is simply because both will agree on same point with no arguments. If friends have similar interests, it will lead to a deeper connection. For example, friends who have similar hobbies will spend more time together enjoying it, thus developing a stronger bond of friendship. Moreover, friends who have the same opinion as yours will be always by your side in any situation. Therefore, having friends with same point of view will be there for you no matter what. With such kind of friends we can experience a life long friendship.
On the other hand, having friends with different opinions will help you understand others’ point of view. Friends with the difference in opinion will have deeper discussions on several issues and will try to voice their opinion making you understand their way of thinking. This will undoubtedly help you adjust and understand the society in a better way. For example, friends who are extroverts in nature can help their introvert friends to socialize easily. It has been observed that friends who support you throughout are indeed your true friend. However, to last long a friendship, heated arguments should be avoided as it can ruin the beautiful feeling of kinship. Hence, having friends with different thoughts and ideas enhances broader knowledge of human nature a
In conclusion, this essay discussed differences in perspectives of friends influence our life. In my opinion, a friend should be loyal and trustworthy to his friend's opinion. Therefore, both friends with similar thinking and with differences in opinion are unequivocally imperative to have a better taste of life as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-19 | Assemkhidhr | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-18 | Assemkhidhr | 11 | view |
| 2024-02-18 | Assemkhidhr | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | SharmisthaNaskar | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | ielts_tony | 84 | view |
- Some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both these views and give your opinion 56
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...y in a better way. For example, friends who are extroverts in nature can help their int...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 771, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nces broader knowledge of human nature a In conclusion, this essay discussed dif...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13373860182 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67425388736 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507598784195 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4888564916 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.45 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.45 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424163399727 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154919969963 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955277776907 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304595122261 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304913938535 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...y in a better way. For example, friends who are extroverts in nature can help their int...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 771, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nces broader knowledge of human nature a In conclusion, this essay discussed dif...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13373860182 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67425388736 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507598784195 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4888564916 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.45 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.45 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424163399727 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154919969963 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955277776907 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304595122261 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304913938535 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.