People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems. Give your opinion
It is true that many people prefer to increase the cost of petrol for transportation in order to solve environmental issues. Personally, I completely agree with this view. There are two main reasons why the government should change the policies: it can reduce the number of personal vehicles and decrease air pollution.
First of all, the change in fuel price can lead to the reduction in using personal transportation like cars, motorcycles, etc. Due to the upturn in petrol price, civils will raise their awareness in traveling by public vehicles as well as cutting off the use of their own cars. For example, in several countries, there are some periods that the cost of fuel increases dramatically, which is the reason why the percentage of using public transport goes up during that time.
Secondly, the increase in petrol price might help decrease the rate of air pollution. The more vehicles used fuel are cut off, the more amount of carbon dioxide cannot be released into the atmosphere. For instance, many reports have shown that the air pollution in urban areas is mainly caused by the upturn in using personal vehicles. In rush hours, there are many traffic jams caused by a huge use of transport. Due to that, the percentage of carbon dioxide in the air goes up significantly. That is why the increase in the cost of fuel might help reduce air pollution as well as protect the environment.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that the thought of increasing fuel price for cars and other vehicles should be concerned by the government. Because it might lead to the reduction in people using personal transport, which is one of the particular reasons causing environmental issues, and also the decrease in air pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | huy ha | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Amanda158 | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94983277592 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76780455413 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484949832776 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.355938311 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.714285714 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236577714225 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830992719092 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860236254062 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167400722106 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663293673977 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.