the table below shows the amount of waste production in 6 different countries over a 20-year period.
The table compares the quantity of waste that was produced in six countries from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, the amount of waste production in the us was the largest , while ireland had the lowest quantity of waste production.
In 1980, the quantity of waste production in the us was the highest, at 131 millions of tonnes, followed by japan ( at 28 millions of tonnes ). In addition, the figure for waste production in poland ranked the third, at 4 millions of tonnes. Over the following 20 years, the us waste production rose gradually and reached a peak of 192 million tonnes, which was 139 millions of tonnes higher than the figure for japan. During the same period, the amount of waste production in poland observed a slight increase to 6,6 m.o.t.
Regarding the korea and ireland waste production, these countries had no recorded amounts of waste production in 1980 and 1990 respectively. In 1980, the quantity of waste produced in Portugal was 2 million tonnes, which was 1,4 millions of tonnes higher than that in ireland. After 20 years, the former and the latter witnessed a slow rise to 6,6 and 5 millions of tonnes respectively. In contrast, korea experienced a decline in waste production from 31 million tonnes in 1990 to 19 million in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ste production in the us was the largest , while ireland had the lowest quantity o...
^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '131 million'.
Suggestion: 131 million
...roduction in the us was the highest, at 131 millions of tonnes, followed by japan at 28 millio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...31 millions of tonnes, followed by japan at 28 millions of tonnes . In addition, ...
^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '28 million'.
Suggestion: 28 million
...llions of tonnes, followed by japan at 28 millions of tonnes . In addition, the figure for wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lowed by japan at 28 millions of tonnes . In addition, the figure for waste produ...
^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...oduction in poland ranked the third, at 4 millions of tonnes. Over the following 20 years, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '139 million'.
Suggestion: 139 million
...a peak of 192 million tonnes, which was 139 millions of tonnes higher than the figure for japan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '4 million'.
Suggestion: 4 million
...tugal was 2 million tonnes, which was 1,4 millions of tonnes higher than that in ireland. Aft...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...latter witnessed a slow rise to 6,6 and 5 millions of tonnes respectively. In contrast, korea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86976744186 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66358649721 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451162790698 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8995145083 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238394832198 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118369758292 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739032487611 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165565156679 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015502373233 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.