In some countries, there has been an increase in the number of advertisements which try to persuade children to buy snacks, toys, and other goods. Parents often claim that these ads are unfair.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
According to statement, in some nations, number of advertisements has proliferated with huge count due to which children become interact to purchase snacks, toys and other items via influenced by ads. However, parents consider that, this trend becomes unfavourable. Thus, from my prospective, former view is more supportive which seeks attention of parents. Couple of views are explained in forthcoming paragraphs.
It is worth considering that, maximization in count of advertisement is increased with rapid speed which recieves huge attraction of youngsters. Because of numerous reasons, this trend is happening. First and foremost is major source of popularity in market. In this criteria, business companies and large scale industries related to goods include toys, snacks and so on, are used to promote these items with aid of advertisement. Due to which, public become interact towards these products which provides prominent number of profit to these factories. As a result, this leads to preferable manner for popularity and financial benefits. Hence, these companies results in regard to progression with commercially and economically.
On other hand, most of the parents and I personally believe that, such advertisements are not favorable prospective because of plenty of reasons. Firstly, snacks are unhygienic for children. Because, these food stuffs contain plethora of unhealthy ingredients and spices. Due to which, these food items become lead to higher level of cholesterol, sugar and so on in blood which results to cause numerous hilarious diseases such as heart issue, digestion problems and so on. Thus, this illustrates adverse impact on mental and physical growth of youngsters. Moreover, another major concern is highly expensive in regard to prices. In this notion, there are higher proportion of toys and other products which are available in market with high priced and unaffordable. Due to which, some parents are unable to purchase such items for their children who results to instability in bondings. Hence, these ads of such products reveals negative impact on couple of parents and children.
To recapitulate, according to my outlook, although advertisements are prominent manner for business sectors. Yet, this also indicates negative impression on individuals via interacting children in regard to products which are advertised.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-16 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 83 | view |
| 2022-02-16 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-16 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 78 | view |
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 67
- Many large cities around the world lack affordable housing What problems does a lack of affordable house cause How can these problems be overcome 59
- Many supermarkets are selling more and more products that are imported from other countries instead of selling food that is locally sourced What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Many countries spend a lot of money on improved transport for urban area while neglected rural transport What are the problems associated with this What are possible solutions 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ajor source of popularity in market. In this criteria, business companies and large ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, such as, as a result, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61731843575 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01498628814 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541899441341 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4567065844 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4090909091 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212876840461 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585795773311 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461878680518 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130398292285 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447926726609 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ajor source of popularity in market. In this criteria, business companies and large ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, such as, as a result, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61731843575 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01498628814 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541899441341 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4567065844 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4090909091 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212876840461 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585795773311 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461878680518 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130398292285 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447926726609 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.