The charts below show the information about British and international students from 2010 to 2012.
The given bar charts illustrate the information about British home students and information students rates for men and women from 2010 to 2012.
The most striking feature can be observed that, the highest position was British home students in the given time period whereas the international students stood at the lowest position as compared British students.
It can be vividly seen that, in the case of men, from 2010 to 2011 the figure of British students declined from above 40 to 25. Adding to it, the figure of British home students significantly rise stood at approximately 45 in 2012. Moreover, from 2010 to 2011 the figure of international students following an increasing trend, rising from 15 to 25. In the end of the year the figure of international students radically upsurged that was 40.
Turning to the rest of description, in the case of women, from 2010 to 2012 the figure of British home students following an increasing trend, rising from approximately 30 to 45. The figure of international students made a remarkable improvements, rising from 15 to 20. As well as comparisons are concerned, the figure of British home students four times more than international students in 2010. In the years 2011 British home students and information students stood at the same level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-28 | missmandeepkaur24@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- University education should be free for all students What extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The given pie chart illustrate the information about energy productions between 1995 to 2005 Data has been calibrated in percentages The most striking feature can be observed that the highest percentage was gas in 1995 while its overtaken by coal in 2005 60
- The graph shoe changes in spending habits of people in UK between 1971 and 2001 100
- The table chart below shows the contribution of variety economic sector to x country gross domestic product in 2016 2017 and 2018 73
- The charts below show the information about British and international students from 2010 to 2012 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'improvement'?
Suggestion: improvement
...nternational students made a remarkable improvements, rising from 15 to 20. As well as compa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1085.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07009345794 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93142651626 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443925233645 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7738313815 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448139503783 0.215688989381 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21933208787 0.103423049105 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990857509652 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325669772898 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120637989084 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.