"On this year's survey about work habits, our employees tended to strongly agree with the idea that if they took less time to complete their assigned work, the quality of their work would suffer. However, we recently conducted an internal study that proves this idea wrong. Managers across several divisions identified an overtime group: the employees who worked an average of 48 or more hours per week over the past year instead of the expected 40 hours per week. We then looked at the number of documented work errors produced by all of our employees during the past year and found that the overtime group was responsible for significantly more work errors overall than their fellow employees. On the basis of these findings, our recommendation to the company president is to require employees at Dexter Gorman Instruments to complete their work during the regular 40-hour work week and allow overtime only for urgent circumstances."
First of all, the author is putting his whole argument on the contradiction between this year's survey about work habits, and many managers opinions. But both of these data source can be subjective and inaccurate. There is no evidence of why we should think this survey is legitimate. Maybe the sample size of the dataset was too low. If the survey was conducted among 20 employees then the data will be heavily skewed. Moreover, how was the samples selected, if the samples were selected on personal opinion and based on liking then the whole survey falls apart. On the other hand, the survey found that, the employees strongly agreed with the idea that if they took less time to complete their assigned work, their work quality will decline. This is absolutely true in any sense of the imagination and should not be taken out of context to prove another point. But the author compares the data to the words of many managers who say overtime employees often make more mistakes. Here, the context is completely blown out of proportion as overtime employees mostly work more hours to do additional work. But the author is misrepresenting as the over time employees are the one's doing their work slowly and are the main samples of the year's survey.
Additionally, more work can create more errors. This is obvious from any angle and the author deliberately ignored the notion. It is very likely that the overtime workers were the one's that had more work to do and thus made comparably more errors. This does not mean more errors are bad but does explain why there is such a discrepancies in the dataset. If an employ works 48 hours or more per week rather than 40 than there will obviously be a lack of rest for the person. If he or she does not get enough rest between their work hours it is very likely that many erroneous events will occur.
Moreover, maybe the manager is very picky and overwork the employees they dislike. This can create a unhealthy environment where the lack of respect and dislike for the work can hurt the end result. Furthermore, it is also possible that the companies does not share any additional benefit for overtime. Thus if employees are forced to overwork themselves they do it with minimal effort thus occurring the errors.
Finally, the author comes into conclusion that companies should only do overtimes only for urgent scenarios. But he or she does not provide any current practices. Maybe many companies already use overtime as a urgent practice. Thus diverging from the 40 hour work ween is common for many. This new claim will not work in these certain institutions. To adopt new ways to reduce errors new analysts and computer based assistance features can be added to point out errors. But the author also does not provide what kind of error detection and reduction mechanisms the companies use.
So, as it stands now, the argument is rife with holes and is severely flawed. A new and better systematic survey about the four issues provided can strengthen the claim further.
- On this year s survey about work habits our employees tended to strongly agree with the idea that if they took less time to complete their assigned work the quality of their work would suffer However we recently conducted an internal study that proves thi 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complain 69
- The following appeared in the summary of a study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates for t 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sample size of the dataset was too low. If the survey was conducted among 20 emplo...
^^
Line 1, column 492, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...lected, if the samples were selected on personal opinion and based on liking then the whole surv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a discrepancy' or simply 'discrepancies'?
Suggestion: a discrepancy; discrepancies
... bad but does explain why there is such a discrepancies in the dataset. If an employ works 48 h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...employees they dislike. This can create a unhealthy environment where the lack of...
^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...re any additional benefit for overtime. Thus if employees are forced to overwork the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... many companies already use overtime as a urgent practice. Thus diverging from th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, as to, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 11.1786427146 197% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2504.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 523.0 441.139720559 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78776290631 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46433862142 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 204.123752495 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483747609943 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 786.6 705.55239521 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.67365269461 358% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 19.7664670659 152% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.336236983 57.8364921388 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.4666666667 119.503703932 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4333333333 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 5.70786347227 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 6.88822355289 232% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292690624756 0.218282227539 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722397535897 0.0743258471296 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100527601604 0.0701772020484 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138906067332 0.128457276422 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11322877219 0.0628817314937 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.3799401198 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.5979740519 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 98.500998004 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sample size of the dataset was too low. If the survey was conducted among 20 emplo...
^^
Line 1, column 492, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...lected, if the samples were selected on personal opinion and based on liking then the whole surv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a discrepancy' or simply 'discrepancies'?
Suggestion: a discrepancy; discrepancies
... bad but does explain why there is such a discrepancies in the dataset. If an employ works 48 h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...employees they dislike. This can create a unhealthy environment where the lack of...
^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...re any additional benefit for overtime. Thus if employees are forced to overwork the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... many companies already use overtime as a urgent practice. Thus diverging from th...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, as to, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 11.1786427146 197% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2504.0 2260.96107784 111% => OK
No of words: 523.0 441.139720559 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78776290631 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46433862142 2.78398813304 89% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 204.123752495 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483747609943 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 786.6 705.55239521 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.67365269461 358% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 19.7664670659 152% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.336236983 57.8364921388 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.4666666667 119.503703932 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4333333333 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 5.70786347227 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 6.88822355289 232% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292690624756 0.218282227539 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722397535897 0.0743258471296 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100527601604 0.0701772020484 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138906067332 0.128457276422 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11322877219 0.0628817314937 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.3799401198 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.5979740519 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 98.500998004 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 12.3882235529 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.