Some people believe men are competitive than women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many believes that the masculine entities are more competitive than the feminine ones. I strongly oppose such a flawed belief as the topic is of a contextual nature and there exists real-life evidence against the perception.
To begin with, it is incorrect to assume that men are generally more competitive as it is heavily dependent on the setting in which one’s competitiveness is assessed. To elaborate, men and women are historically proven to excel in distinctive fields of works or activities, where women are known to be more creative, men succeed in logical tasks. As a result, it is important for a man or a woman, to consider the benefits and the viability of competing against the others. Ultimately, a man or a woman would only be competitive if the task they are carrying out is possible and is worth the cost of participating in such competition, thus, invalidating an overall suggestion of men being more competitive than women.
In addition to the referenced argument, there are also real-life instances where women can show significantly higher competitiveness than men, acting against the presented claim. Women become exceedingly more competitive when it come to the welfare of their children. Counter-intuitively, men have historically been believed to be the breadwinner of a family. However, in the modern society, we can observe women contest fiercely, in the right for custody of their children, in most cases, more effortful than that of their male partner. Consequently, the demonstration of such will compete discard the notion of the masculine sides being more competitive than their feminine counterpart.
In conclusion, genders are competitive in varying contexts and there are real-life demonstration of women having a greater extent drive to compete. Therefore, I convey my opposition against the perception of men being more superior than women in terms of competitiveness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | vidung | 90 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The spread of multinational companies and the increase of globalisation produces positive effects for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of enery in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...me exceedingly more competitive when it come to the welfare of their children. Count...
^^^^
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...ion against the perception of men being more superior than women in terms of competitiveness.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in most cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31683168317 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29538243008 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53795379538 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9499502311 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.923076923 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251106871789 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983704760163 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499149278504 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161285238674 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374317034023 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.