The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation.
The given maps describe the differences in student accommodation between 2010 and now.
Looking at the pictures, it is immediately obvious that the building has undergone a number of significant changes. Overall, the expansion in the number of bedrooms for students has happened in tandem with the introduction as well as the elimination of some other features.
In 2010, the were only three student bedrooms. However, in the current plan, this figure has been increased to 5 by the replacement for the former living room and construction of another one next to it. Despite the elimination of the living room, the kitchen now has been expanded for being used as a social area at the same time.
Currently, a new ensuite has been constructed to the right of the hall, reducing its size. Finally, outside of the building, the south garden has been turned into a parking, while the north side remained unchanged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
- The graph shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK 84
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 78
- The pie charts below show the types of media used from 1990 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graphs give information about average house prices in England and other parts of the world 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98039215686 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80313684039 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653594771242 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8996328777 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0713245739706 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353204733991 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514395369813 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0533817854363 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552583570432 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98039215686 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80313684039 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653594771242 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8996328777 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0713245739706 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353204733991 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514395369813 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0533817854363 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552583570432 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.