The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.
Summerize the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparision where revelant.
The given pie charts illustrate why people moved in and out of the UK in the year 2007.
Overall, it is clear that the majority of both immigrants and emigrants to the UK were due to Definite job. Also of particular note is that the disparity in the percentage of immigrants and emigrants to the UK was obvious in Formal study term.
As can be seen from the charts, Definite job was the most important reason among both immigrants and emigrants, which amounted to 30% and 29% respectively. Additionally, the percentage of immigrants to the UK for Accompany was 15%, which was higher than that of emigrants (13%). In contrast, 14% emigrants moved out of the UK for other reasons, and the figure for immigrants was lower, at 11%.
While the reason Formal study constituted the second greatest percentage of immigrants to the UK (26%), the opposite was true for that of emigrants, which just made up 4%. In the meantime, 22% people moved out of the UK to look for work, in comparison with 12% those who moved in. Similarly, the percentage of No reason stated emigrants was 18%, which was 3 times as much as that of immigrants.
- The chart shows British emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a negative or positive trend 84
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nts to the UK were due to Definite job. Also of particular note is that the disparit...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, second, similarly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.665 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71344338434 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1543391291 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124661808135 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630036571021 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360464924628 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926547387565 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038895520742 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.