The given bar chart compares about how a plethora of students chose certain University subject matter in 2005. The information consists of Sciences, Mathematics, Social Sciences, Languages, Humanities, The Art, Literature, Law.
As can see, males’ preferable choices appeared to be predominant in the realms of natural sciences (Sciences and Mathematics) and language-based subjects (Law and Literature). In contrast, the most popular choices among females were Social Sciences, Languages, and The Arts. The only field of study, which left no gap between the gender choices was Humanities.
In detail, around 24, 000 females chose social sciences, considerably higher than the guy at about 14, 000. Also, the total (24, 000) was the peak level as compared to other affair. Next came Languages with approximately 18, 000 for girls vs 2, 000 for boys, making it (2, 000) the least total in the year. Sciences stood at merely over 20, 000 (boys), which was relatively twice as much as the females at around 10, 000. As for Mathematics, females stood at 4, 000, which was nowhere near as close as guy with 18, 000.
In contrast, the remaining case for both genders were not as popular as the discussed courses. Literature was chosen by 15, 000 guy, which was a bit larger than the counterparts at 12, 000. The net figure for Humanities were equal at 12, 000 each for both sexes. While females dominated the arts with 9, 000 and 3, 000 (boys), guy surpassed Law with 10, 000 and 6000 (girls) respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: sciences
...be predominant in the realms of natural sciences Sciences and Mathematics and language-based subj...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'total' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'totals'.
Suggestion: totals
...00 for boys, making it 2, 000 the least total in the year. Sciences stood at merely o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'guy' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'guys'.
Suggestion: guys
...urses. Literature was chosen by 15, 000 guy, which was a bit larger than the counte...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90513833992 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72737010767 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557312252964 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.4477785811 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.6428571429 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.