The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows the percentage of small, medium, large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016.

The bar chart compared the proportions of three kinds of companies including small, medium, and large that were presented on social media for business purposes during the 4-year period from 2012.

Overall, the year 2015 recorded the disappearance of many companies of all business types. Additionally, large businesses are the most active and most consistent users throughout the surveyed period.

From 2012 to 2013, small companies saw a gradual increase in social media usage, from under 30 percent to around 35 percent, the rate of medium businesses also follow the same trend, going up significantly from the similar starting point to nearly 50 percent. At the same time, large companies made extensive use of social media, with the figures almost standing at under 80 percent.

After 2 years of growth, all types of business underwent a dramatic decline in 2015. The proportion of users of small and medium businesses reduced to the same rate, at 30 percent, while the figures of large companies dropped to over 50 percent. Nevertheless, in the next year, the rapid recovery trend could be seen in every kind of business.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-26 TLan168 view
2023-07-03 Mollymaul 90 view
2023-02-25 kitemy123 view
2023-02-25 kitemy123 view
2022-07-11 xxlusubuxx 84 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, while, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15135135135 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65181278184 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4260393898 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31503099431 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132291455113 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121372456507 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209584157671 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127561684951 0.0819641961636 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, while, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15135135135 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65181278184 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4260393898 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.125 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31503099431 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132291455113 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121372456507 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209584157671 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127561684951 0.0819641961636 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.