Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as hobbies or interests and whether they are married or single some people say this information may be relevant and useful others disagree discuss both views and give your opinion.
Getting a career might require writing down personal information on the sheets being given that sometimes presumed not to be fruitful for an employer. Although, these inquiries seem to explain some simple features, watching them in details some clandestine qualifications get elucidated. This essay elaborates on both sides of the argument by citing the uselessness and the benefits of sharing such data.
On one hand, by meeting professional requirements in a job applying process, simple personal information should not be considered since it may just prompt in erroneous judgement. To be more precise, within cotemporary era which qualification speaks first, the requested information should only be on the basis of professional aspects not about peripheral personal information. The latter approach just results in offering a position to an applicant who is not the best priority on the list. For example, one of my talented friends applied for a job opportunity announcing that a civil engineer will be recruited if she is able to meet the entry requirements. Amazingly, she found herself meeting the all. However, because of just being single this opportunity was given to another interview participance who was married although her qualities were in lower position in comparison with my qualified friend. Therefore, if experts or any other experienced people look more precisely, they will come down into a result indicating that the most necessary information being asked should be the professional ones which illustrates how capable and able the applicant is in order to be chosen for the particular job.
On the other hand, what personal inquiries would reveal is how much employers are going to get influenced by surrounding factors excluding how suitable they would in terms of professional notions. Certainly, by observing different lifestyles including positive or negative hobbies, people living around and personal interactions, recruiters can estimate whether this person has a clear blueprint in his life or not. For instance, a video on YouTube just showed that companies which are profoundly seeking improvements are freely concentrated on the atmosphere that the job applicant is living in. They also opined that those interview participants mentioning positive habits existing in their lives consequently perform more accurately under company circumstances. Thus, asking for personal information in my perspective just demonstrate more transparent vision about the job seekers. What I additionally emphasis on, is the importance of personal data in terms of background since Looking at this source of information might help to anticipate the extent that the applicant is about to get enhanced.
All in all, in some jab applying processes, some personal inquiries might be asked that in the first sight seem to be useless. Even Though, answering to personal questions could be often overwhelming, these questions are able to show the potentials of people in a protracting period. I personally do believe that answering the personal questions as accurate and as complete as possible can even increase the chance of getting the job. This essay generally discussed both sides of the discussion mentioning different beliefs and contrary contemplations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-06 | Sarina2021 | 67 | view |
- The tables below show how many international students study in Canada and the United States by country of origin Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In some countries owning a home rather renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- The Statement should reflect your ability to communicate clearly and provide an overview of your academic and research background your professional and career goals and your area of research interest Additionally the Statement should describe a rationale 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Getting a career might require writing d...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and the benefits of sharing such data. On one hand, by meeting professional req...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r to be chosen for the particular job. On the other hand, what personal inquiri...
^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... personal inquiries would reveal is how much employers are going to get influenced b...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he applicant is about to get enhanced. All in all, in some jab applying process...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2771.0 1615.20841683 172% => OK
No of words: 504.0 315.596192385 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49801587302 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08987057497 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 176.041082164 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 869.4 506.74238477 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.0069947219 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.55 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335130422801 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904052463849 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533508045661 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193642361665 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207270849025 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 78.4519038076 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.