The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs give information the cinema presence in Australia and the reasonable cinema visits by different age range in 5 years.
Look at the first graphs chart, we can see in 1997 attendance higher than attendance in 1998. Look at the second graphs. It can be seen that, cinema visit according to age groups in 1996 the age group 14-24 ascending until 2000. Meanwhile, the age group 50+ descending from year 2000.
At the first graphs chart, in 1996 attendance have lowest number is 62%. In contrast, in 1997 and 1998 have the same number is 72%. Until 1999, presence down 2% compared to 2 years ago is 70%. In 2000 attendance equal to 1997 and 1998. But with frequency in 1998 and 2000 have the same number is 8,3. Meanwhile, in 1996 have higher than compared to 2 years ago is 10,3. In 1997, highest in 5 years is 11,1. The lowest in the chart is only 1999 is 8,2.
Look at the second graphs chart, the comparison regarding the average to age group in 1096 to 2000. In age group 14-24 in 1996 have number is 10 but in last years a little more than 5%. In 1996 with age group 25-35 have number a little more than 15%. Meanwhile, 34-49 in 1998 lowest and have number a little than 10% but in 2000 have 15%. In contrast, with age groups 50+ have 10% in 1996 and in 2000 have number a little more than 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-21 | nvtrung309 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programs example charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports for young children 84
- The diagram below shows how a modern landfill for household waste is designed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 67
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 67
- The advantages brought the spread of English as a global language will outweigh the disadvantages Tow what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the lowest'.
Suggestion: have the lowest
... first graphs chart, in 1996 attendance have lowest number is 62%. In contrast, in 1997 and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.27822580645 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15619509537 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.387096774194 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.259683693 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 58.9444444444 112.824112599 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.7777777778 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242814634591 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089909698357 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093389664061 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199835136928 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10321264754 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.6 13.2329268293 42% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 100.58 61.2550243902 164% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 2.5 10.3012195122 24% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.95 11.4140731707 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 5.62 8.06136585366 70% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.