the chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart illustrates the percentage of 3 different approaches which people in 5 territories could have their coffee or tea by. The provided options were buying fresh coffee or instant kind and even going to café. Also, people were living in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart and the timescale was a four-week span.
Overall, the most preferable option in all 5 locations was relatively going to café for coffee and tea. The mid-range choice was having instant coffee. Moreover, the lowest category was purchasing a fresh coffee.
To begin with the measurable percentages for the prioritized approach were different and it started at 49% in Adelaide reaching around 63%. in both Hobart and Melbourne. The other cities such as Sydney, Brisbane stood at 62% and 56%, respectively.
On the other hand, the allocated percentages for having instant coffee fluctuated around 50% in all regions generally. It worth to be pointed out that Hobart and Brisbane had approximately equal share by around 53% and actually they were the high-ranked cities in this term. The percentage of this share deteriorated in other remained cities and it experienced about a 7% decrease in Sydney. Buying fresh coffee was standing at the lowest-rated selection starting by 34% in Brisbane and Adelaide and rising around 44% in Sydney despite its fluctuation in other locations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-23 | Sarina2021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-05-23 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-29 | Sarina2021 | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-29 | Sarina2021 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this state Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 89
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The tables below show how many international students study in Canada and the United States by country of origin Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the years 1996 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- Central and local governments make a frantic attempt to promote festivals to create a lot of revenue some people think this money should not be invested this much To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given bar chart illustrates the perc...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the timescale was a four-week span. Overall, the most preferable option in a...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egory was purchasing a fresh coffee. To begin with the measurable percentages...
^^^
Line 5, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...at 49% in Adelaide reaching around 63%. in both Hobart and Melbourne. The other ci...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stood at 62% and 56%, respectively. On the other hand, the allocated percent...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, moreover, so, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26126126126 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83739450277 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585585585586 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.950238202 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8461538462 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0925379414174 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332236965268 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028806469261 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0542923663869 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365830765004 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.