Music has been and will continue to be the universal language of mankind. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In many parts of the world, music plays a significant role in cultural differences. Many hold a belief that music deserves to be called as a universal language no matter in the past or future. To the best of my knowledge, this point of view is grounded for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that music and languages are closely intertwined in one way or another. Nowadays, many studies have shown that although it is invisible, music has an irreplaceable function of expressing thoughts and feelings, which is the main characteristic of language. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to overlook the fact that music can express emotions that cannot be describe by words. For example, higher pitch, fluctuations in melody and faster tempo can transmit happiness, while slow rhythm conveys sadness. This example is the illustration of the fact that music can touch the diverse emotions of listeners.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this is that music is not a universal language, because in different countries, people prefer various types of music. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account is the fact that in the past each country has its own style of music that depends on their cultures; nevertheless, due to cutural globalization, people are inclined to enjoy similar kinds of music from dominant cultures. For instance, according to the survey conducted by BBC News, English has become an international language that is accompanied by the growing interests in US-UK music.
In conclusion, music is a universal language that connects people all around the world towards emotions and cultures as mentioned above.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-01-22 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 51 | view |
2022-01-22 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 11 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 89
- Some people argue that holding sporting events is beneficial to countries development However other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The chart below gives information about the high speed continuous Internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 74
- The graph shows the percentage of households with different kinds of technology in the UK from 1997 to 2001 89
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 78
Comments
I agree that music is the…
I agree that music is the way to get to know other cultures and see the differences. And with Internet the speed of communication became much faster. So this is why I like Spotify. There is much music there. And if you use spotify promotion you will have a chance to get a quality followers that will help you grow. Well, at least that's what my father says.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...gnificant role in cultural differences. Many hold a belief that music deserves to be call...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16071428571 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97103148102 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.53033856 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.153846154 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225835065605 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780000321766 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517008609851 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134946907628 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165117703276 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.