Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations
It is known that climate changes, ozone layer disturbance, global warming and some species extinction are all consequences of human behavior. It is necessary that society understand that changes must be made to save our planet and future generations from an ineffable deterioration. I strongly support the idea that our current lifestyle will have a nefarious effect on future generations. I feel this way for the following reasons.
Firstly, nowadays the main energy source globally used comes from non-renewable sources like oil. The lack of investments on renewable sources of energy such as solar and eolic is a huge problem that we face today. In the future, oil could be no longer available and without previous investments on other alternatives, future generations could face shortage in various fields and serious economic problems due to the current misuse of energy sources.
Secondly, pollution levels increased a lot last decades. There is a lack of public policies to face this problem. For example, some kind of penalty should be applied to industries, companies and car owners in order to reduce gas emissions. The consequences of this notorious increase in pollution affect current society and could affect future generations also. Since new respiratory and other kinds of diseases may appear in consequence of that.
Finally, the wrong waste disposal affects our water resources and soil globally. Efforts should be made by society and politicians to find a way to avoid domestic and industrial incorrect waste diposal. The industrial waste can be more dangerous and fatal, since it may contain chemicals nocive to our health. We should protect our soil and water. Otherwise, future generations will not be able to harvest their own food leading to global starvation.
To sum up, I strongly believe that our nowadays routine life will have a negative impact on future generations. This is mainly because of our bad usage of natural resources and lack of investments on environmentally friendly technologies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-25 | Shubham Patel | 92 | view |
- Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human hea 69
- Summarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage-four-day workweek. 81
- TOEFL integrated writing work a four day week 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teachers ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ety and could affect future generations also. Since new respiratory and other kinds ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, i feel, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 322.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32608695652 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91941488922 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593167701863 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2035701818 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2631578947 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9473684211 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220891009026 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639116434042 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784362256232 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125965761542 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07643138871 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.