Family life in the modern world is not the same experience as in the past
Family life in the modern world is not the same experience as in the past, because families are smaller. In the past, there were advantages and disadvantages to being members of a larger family.
I believe there were four benefits. Firstly, If the family had a lot of members, we might share household chores, which helped reduce the burden on parents. Secondly, when there were many different generations living together, especially grandparents, we could hear many old stories such as Wartime, Wartime life,… and they also looked after young children when their parents were away. Thirdly, the family was the place to return to if we feel exhausted. Finally, because of many people, so it was impossible to avoid quarrels, but we would learn to defend ourselves after quarrels.
I think there were also many disadvantages in the big family as extended family. As far as I know, finances were the leading cause of quarrels. Because in the family, parents were the earners. If parents didn’t have a job, the family wouldn’t have money to take care of monthly financial payments, which leads to quarrels. Sometimes, you had no privacy because there were so many members. And…
In my opinion, the advantages of big families were greater than the disadvantages. However, we had so many conflicts and problems, but we always loved, helped, and supported each other. And you would happiness, never lonely in a larger family. Anyway, I preferred to live in a big family because I wanted to live with my grandparents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-04 | MinyiChu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-05 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | vishal sachdeva | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | giangngoc | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-07 | ieltsstudent | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...n on parents. Secondly, when there were many different generations living together, especially...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...ld stories such as Wartime, Wartime life,… and they also looked after young childr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, i think, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72907070184 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562992125984 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.706289756 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.375 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205484327259 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799403119042 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190734510781 0.0667982634062 286% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194148372726 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.241969401854 0.056905535591 425% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.