The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The diagram depicts how clothes are manufactured from recycled plastic bottles looking from an overall perspective, it is really clear this man-made process comprises various stages, beginning with collecting plastic and ending with finished clothes rolls being transported to dealers
At the first stage of the process, plastic bottles are gathered from landfills after which it is delivered to recycling factories where bottles are sorted on the shelf and using a crusher cutting plastics into small pieces. After passing through this machine, the filtered machine is pumped water to remove impurities before being exposed to the sunlight to dry for 10 hours.
The process continues with dry plastics being added into a big tank where it is boiled. After that, these mixtures are filled up with three long tubes which have different colors of yarn before being weaved into clothes rolls. Finally, completed products are recycled clothes which are delivered to supermarkets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-09 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | alohahahihi | view | |
| 2023-08-25 | Duc2711@ | view |
- M t s ng i ngh r ng s c kh e t t l r t quan tr ng i v i m i ng i v v y d ch v y t kh ng n n c i u h nh b i c c c ng ty v l i nhu n u i m c a d ch v y t t nh n c v t tr i h n nh c i m kh ng 11
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town
- The graph below shows the population of Chile by age group between 1975 and 2035 78
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think a positive or negative development 61
- The chart shows the hours per week spent watching TV by gender and by age group in 2011 in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparation where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, look, really, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47368421053 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48245226582 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651315789474 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 160.501214949 43.030603864 373% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 166.4 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19719860229 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903697039756 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842035880298 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138347675043 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305667219273 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.4329268293 236% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.