People need to take risks, both in their professional lives and their personal lives. Do you think that the advantages of taking risks outweigh the advantages?
It is said that risk-taking is an important part of people’s lives, whether personally or professionally. I believe that experiencing a risk has equal advantages and disadvantages.
I believe that there are several advantages to people taking risks in their lives. Individuals who are risk-takers are more exposed to new and unforeseen opportunities that can help them pleasantly progress at different levels of their lives. Doing risky activities usually makes people more confident, as they try to improve their skills and learn new things which can make them stand out from the others. Taking risks allows people to develop skills and learn things that they have never experienced in their lives, and to become goal-oriented individuals who tend to overcome failures and gain success. This situation gives them a sense of pride and accomplishment and lets them have enough courage to cope with different challenges that life throws at them.
Despite the advantages mentioned above, taking a risk may have some negative outcomes for people. The best example of this is running the risk of starting a business. Most of the time some people do not consider the risks of running a business, and they want to become rich quickly. So, they may do some activities wrong and lose their market share, which can cause them to go bankrupt. This is a kind of unpleasant experience that no one likes to face. Also, doing some adventurous activities, such as extreme sports which are usually done by individuals as entertainment, can lead to increased irreparable injuries, disabilities and even death. Therefore, individuals have to pay attention to the forthcoming consequences of their risks and make the right decision about whether they are worth doing or not.
In conclusion, in my view, taking risks has both benefits and drawbacks. People should try to take appropriate precautions when they want to do risky activities in different parts of their lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-20 | NgHgM | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-28 | ojehparvaz | 82 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | ojehparvaz | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | ojehparvaz | 74 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | ojehparvaz | 73 | view |
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situat 58
- The crime rate has increased with the advancement of technology Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion 78
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
- The following appeared in a letter to the city council of Canbury from the president of Plexma Motors I am pleased that the council is considering Plexma s plans to open a new manufacturing site in Canbury next year In addition to our regular line of cars 58
- Claim young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets have hurt their development of social skills Reasons these devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than f 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...aking risks in their lives. Individuals who are risk-takers are more exposed to new and...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17981072555 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9353850491 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548895899054 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3826992446 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333231810034 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131782106894 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100722334107 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238968006779 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303773253722 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.