The chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003-2006. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart give information about the rate of adults of various age group in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006.
Overall, it can be seen that adults of different age group in 2003 have marginally more than age group in 2004. However, the completely different we can see that when look at the specific figures.
Look at the bar chart in the first year, in 2003. The percentage of adults of various age group in the UK used the Internet have highest number among 4 years, the age group 16-24 also the youngest age among 4 groups. In 2003, this age group have 80% and 2004 has the same number. Meanwhile, 2005 and 2006 have number just a little bit more is 100% and 90%. With the second age group 25-44 in 2006 reduced from 10% to 80%. Similar to 2006, the remaining three years all decreased significantly. In 2003 have number about 45%, with the next year in 2004 have 60%, and 2005 have number about 70%.
With the oldest age groups are quite stable but has dropped significantly in the last age group. Adults used Internet in age group 45-54 in 2003 have number 60% and 2004 has marginally than about 64%. In 2005 and 2006 just has a little bit more 1% or 2% about 65% and 66%. By contrast, with the age group 55-64. In the first three year only about 1% or 2% behind each other, respectively 25% and 26%, 23%. However, in 2006 in that age group have highest number about 45%. Finally, the last age group 65+ is the lowest age group used Internet. But in this age group don’t have specific figures in 2003. In 2004 and 2005,2006 whose data are respectively 19%,18% and 20%. So, in the UK the older people are, the less they want to use the Internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view | |
| 2024-09-24 | Sheikh Sajib | view |
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is ba n ned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts below the result of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 73
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views a 73
- Some people say we do not need printed papers newspaper anymore as there are other means To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e group in the UK who used the Internet everyday from 2003 to 2006. Overall, it can be ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...s age group in the UK used the Internet have highest number among 4 years, the age group 16-...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...while, 2005 and 2006 have number just a little bit more is 100% and 90%. With the second a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
... about 64%. In 2005 and 2006 just has a little bit more 1% or 2% about 65% and 66%. By con...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 441, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...23%. However, in 2006 in that age group have highest number about 45%. Finally, the last age...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 315.0 196.424390244 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.33650793651 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13976260978 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450793650794 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2418792146 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.3 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226507618266 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890500259984 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084247302322 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206388291523 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113098949876 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.2329268293 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.09 61.2550243902 147% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.03 8.06136585366 75% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.