The given diagram illustrates the project of a medical center in 2008 and in 2010.
Overall, it is manifest from the diagram that, there were lots of changes that were made in just two years.
According to the diagram, in 2008, the main entrance was opened to the waiting room that led towards the north side. In the waiting room, staff office and reception were there. To the right side of the waiting room, a laboratory was opened which also had access from the waiting room. On the northwest side, the treatment room was opened. From the right side of the treatment room, there was three doctor's office which also opened the door to the corridor.
In 2010, looking towards to the southwest ward an education room and mother and child room were constructed. The pharmacy was designed on the southeast side behind the laboratory which also opened the door to the corridor. Interestingly, a doctor's office turned into small and converted to four instead of three officers. The storeroom was added to the northeast side just after the doctor's room.
- The table and chart below show the domestic water use and cost in 5 countries 67
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table shows data about what people in the UK thought the government should increase spending on 73
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 84
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 241, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
... door to the corridor. Interestingly, a doctors office turned into small and converted ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83977900552 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37588332766 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491712707182 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.10306437 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.6363636364 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4545454545 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63636363636 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0732689693634 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392997818186 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728450283021 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883085191712 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100068741024 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.