The pie charts compare the units of electricity production using five different fuels in two separate countries in 1980 and 2000.
Overall, Australia and France both had a similar increase in total production and an obvious change in each category of fuel used. In the comparison between 1980 and 2000, Australia depended virtually on coal to produce electricity, while nuclear power was used increasingly in France to do this.
Coal took the lion's share of Australian electricity production with 50 units in 1980 and ballooned to 130 units in 2000. In contrast, France's electricity production, which was produced through coal, had stable figures with 25 units in these two years.
France saw a sharp increase in the quantity of electricity generated by nuclear power, from only 15 units in 1980 to 126 units in 2000, while Australia did not use this kind of energy source.
The figures on natural gas for both nations fell dramatically to 2 units in 2000. Electricity production by oil was moderate in these countries in 1980. However, in 2000, Australia dropped to 2 units, while France rose slightly from 20 to 25 units.
- Task 2 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment Give reasons for your answer a 84
- the pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igures with 25 units in these two years. France saw a sharp increase in the quant...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... did not use this kind of energy source. The figures on natural gas for both nati...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, as for, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17837837838 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03977047305 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583783783784 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 107.412992791 43.030603864 250% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 136.857142857 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444652238119 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217583713012 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901076339775 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266627781288 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069695049109 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.