The table and the pie chart depict the source of Police finance and the distribution purpose in 2017 and 2018.
Overall, it can be clear from the data that there was an increase in the police budget in a year and the majority of the budget was used for salaries of offices and staff.
According to the table, the financial support went up by about 3.9 million euros from 2017 to 2018, in which national government was the main source of this budget, making up approximately 60% in total. Meanwhile, only about one-tenth of the whole money was from other sources, for example, grants, etc.
From the information of the pie chart, although having the most percentage of money spent from the financial support, the distribution for salaries slightly dropped from 75% in 2017 to 69% in the next year. The amount of expense for building and transport remained at 70% whereas that for technology grew up significantly by about 6% in total.
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting t 78
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 67
- The pie charts below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
- The maps illustrate an industrial area in Norbiton in the present day compared with plans for future development of the site 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other sources, for example, grants, etc. From the information of the pie chart, a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 782.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79754601227 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55905448025 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58282208589 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.7788489815 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300292785305 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144098555283 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690178038168 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181193540352 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442747097939 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.