The maps show the alterations that the village of Ryemouth has experienced since 1995. Between 1995 and the present, the community has undergone numerous changes. There are several additional amenities now available, including a tennis court, a golf course, apartments, and parking spaces.
The fields and forest that were on the village's north-eastern edge in 1995 have been cleared, and a golf course and tennis court have been built in their place. To the east of the hotel, which is situated in the southeast, a parking facility has also been constructed.
The road that once ran north-south has been extended to the west due to modifications that have taken place on the village's western side. To the south of the road that was built to the west, more homes have been created. Restaurants have been constructed in place of the shops that were in the village's south-western corner. To the south-west of the hamlet, the fish market and the harbor have both been demolished, and apartments have been built in their stead.
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams by subject and gender during the period 2010 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams by subject and gender during the period 2010 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01162790698 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72309097271 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4837774822 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7777777778 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.095525811246 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594540701621 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861515241779 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886593853141 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827152349348 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.