Some people think that, due to improvements in technology, traditional skills of writing letters will disappear.
do you agree or disagree?
Some people might disagree that improvement in technology causes a threat to traditional skills of writing. However, I do believe that computers and gadgets will completely disrupt traditional skills of writing.
To begin with, in the modern era, jobs that require traditional skills of writing letters are nearly impossible to find. As a reverse condition, almost every letter now is written using computers. Therefore, for people in a productive age, this condition might lead to people’s inability to focus on traditional writing ability using paper as they have no future career in doing so. In line with that, people equipped themselves with a set of computer skills to widen opportunities for jobs.
In addition, regarding education, more and more courses relating to writing on computers are now provided in University showing a switch in people’s writing focus. This may make people abandon traditional writing skills and switch into learning certain writing apps on computers. For example, there are a lot of courses that strengthen people’s ability on how to use certain writing applications on computers, namely, Ms Word, Ms Office and Ms excel. Frankly, writing skills are still needed, but the form is now different.
Nevertheless, some traditional writers might comment that computers will not be able to provide writing as beautiful as handwriting. I must say that writing on a piece of paper is an art, but artificial intelligence and algorithms in computers could duplicate even the most beautiful writing in the world through the Internet.
In conclusion, owing to the fact that traditional skills of writing letters may not be promising for career and limited access to further people skills on traditional writing style, it has shown that traditional skills of writing letters will disappear in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-04 | Revivo Tulaseket | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that the radio is more enjoyable and practical than TV What is your opinion 61
- Group eam activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone Do you agree or disagree 78
- A lot of people have become dependent on technology as it plays a big role in our daily lives Do you agree that living in computer age has more advantages than disadvantages 61
- A lot of people have become dependent on technology as it plays a big role in our daily lives Do you agree that living in computer age has more advantages than disadvantages 89
- Some people think that due to improvements in technology traditional skills of writing letters will disappear do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...skills to widen opportunities for jobs. In addition, regarding education, more a...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ional skills of writing letters may not be promising for career and limited access to furthe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, frankly, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35738831615 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90004640095 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53264604811 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7164371613 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.923076923 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400235366984 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150201567207 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100581169164 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242840928334 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095534006384 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...skills to widen opportunities for jobs. In addition, regarding education, more a...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ional skills of writing letters may not be promising for career and limited access to furthe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, frankly, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35738831615 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90004640095 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53264604811 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7164371613 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.923076923 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400235366984 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150201567207 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100581169164 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242840928334 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095534006384 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.