Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In many parts of the world, there have a growing number of people who are concerned about works and technology. It is generally believed that technology development gives people a chance to work and study at their home. This essays attempts to prove that this issue embraces both benefits and drawbacks.
There are numerous clear benefits related to this issue. However, for the most part, the one thing that really stands out is that technology offers everyone opportunies to work everywhere. For example, during the outbreak of Covid-19 pandemic, going to schools or workfields is nearly impossible, so that online connection helps us keep going our duties in quarantine duration. Additionally, another obvious plus point might be that the more technology is applied, the more funds invested for education lands or workplaces are saved. This means that when they are flexible to work anywhere, there is no need for government to pay a huge amount of money for renting working or schooling lands
Despite above-mentioned merits, it is fair to say that there are certain negative aspects related to this issue. The most unfavourable quality might be that social interaction may be limit if people just talk or discuss through the Internet. Especially children between the age of 5 and 10, it is extremely necessesary for them to go to school so as to meet teachers or play with classmates. Online education prevents these children enjoying the beauty of real life or gaining social knowledge. Another stumbling block might be that younger generation may utilise the technology in wrong way. According to 2020s reports, when teachers organised an online examination, 56% high school students completed the test quickly without thinking by online researches
From the foregoing discussion, it is fair to say that the flexible technology give for us a chance to work everyplace or every time as well as keep a huge investment expenses. Nevertheless, it is justifiable to say that children can be lost their childhoods or cheat in their exams if they abuse of Internet very much
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | Nguyen144202 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | oanh2020 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | maidiem.1508 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | thanhbinh | 61 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bvious plus point might be that the more technology is applied, the more funds in...
^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ly necessesary for them to go to school so as to meet teachers or play with classmates. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xams if they abuse of Internet very much
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, well, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12941176471 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81225690991 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9234642818 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207120223293 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635936353521 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528343280012 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121316607629 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484138228654 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bvious plus point might be that the more technology is applied, the more funds in...
^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ly necessesary for them to go to school so as to meet teachers or play with classmates. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xams if they abuse of Internet very much
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, well, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12941176471 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81225690991 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9234642818 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.571428571 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207120223293 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635936353521 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528343280012 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121316607629 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484138228654 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.