It is believed that students using phone should be prohibited when they go to school. The counter parts suggest that students be allowed to use their phones.
On one hand, banning children from using phones during schooltime brings loads of merits. It is a rewarding way to help them concentrate on the lessons. Without the help of the cutting- edge, they have to brainstorm and ask their teachers whenever they encounter difficulties resolving the tough questions. Not only is it likely to help strengthen the relationship between the students and their teachers but it also promote students critical thinking. In addition, using phones in the class is the leading cause of noise and distraction. If students explore something interesting while surfing the social media, they tend to share it with their classmates and then they will ignore what their teacher is saying.
On the other hand, using phones when going to school should not be forbidden due to some reasons. Firstly, children need phones in the urgent circumstances. A good example is that students have illness and they can call for their family if their teacher and friends are not beside them. Secondly, there are some tough questions that students want to answer so they can take advantage of their rest time to look up these on the Internet, which assist them to save time. Moreover, students can take photos of their lesson in case they have not done writing down all of the knowledge.
In conclusion, it is vital to prevent students from using phones during the lessons in order to improve the quality of their academic performance, but they should be allowed to use phones in their fun time.
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town Norbiton and planned future development of the site 78
- IN SOME COUNTRIES MORE AND MORE PEOPLE ARE BECOMING INTERESTED IN FINDING OUT ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THE HOUSE OR BUILDING THEY LINE IN WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR THIS HOW CAN PEOPLE RESEARCH THIS 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 78
- the diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar canes summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 419, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'promotes'?
Suggestion: promotes
...students and their teachers but it also promote students critical thinking. In addition...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ignore what their teacher is saying. On the other hand, using phones when goi...
^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...in case they have not done writing down all of the knowledge. In conclusion, it is vit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne writing down all of the knowledge. In conclusion, it is vital to prevent st...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92882562278 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.527847963 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540925266904 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7098212106 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325018539466 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131476970922 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102186238012 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249915000991 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713698633829 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 419, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'promotes'?
Suggestion: promotes
...students and their teachers but it also promote students critical thinking. In addition...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ignore what their teacher is saying. On the other hand, using phones when goi...
^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...in case they have not done writing down all of the knowledge. In conclusion, it is vit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne writing down all of the knowledge. In conclusion, it is vital to prevent st...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92882562278 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.527847963 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540925266904 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7098212106 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325018539466 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131476970922 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102186238012 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249915000991 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713698633829 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.