The table shows the frequency of grown - up people in a European nation who used the internet from 2006 to 2010.
Overall, The internet was less popular to the adults in the first year, but 4 years later it gained its popularity among grown-ups in one European country with more and more adults used it.
In 2006, the numbers of adults who used internet in one country in European everyday was the lowest in 4 years with only 35%. This figure gradually went up year by year from 35% to 60% in the last year given. The weekly internet users stayed unchanged in the first 3 years with 16% before a slight decline in the last 2 years and reached 8% in 2010.
The number of people who used the internet less than 3 times a month decreased minimally yearly from 13% in 2006 to 9% 2010. There was a downward trend in the percentage of non- internet users in this country during the given years. It also witnessed a downward trend during the period shown from 36% in the first year to 19 percent in 2010.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 56
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 67
- The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed employed or in further education in 1980 1990 and 2000 78
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...sed internet in one country in European everyday was the lowest in 4 years with only 35%...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39037433155 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16955429101 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508021390374 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4361066549 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284846184013 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147905062457 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115996832149 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209748510116 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748042528632 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.48 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.