The two pie charts depict the use of energy in various segments of an Australian household, and the resultant greenhouse gases as a by-product of that energy use in an unspecified time frame.
Overall, it is evident that heating and water heating accounted for major energy consumption, whereas cooling, refrigeration, lighting and other appliances consumed less energy on average. Simultaneously, the gas emissions are given-off in large amounts by water heating and other appliances, while cooling, lighting, refrigeration and heating produce lower quantities.
Heating and water heating accounted for the highest energy consumption in an Australian family with 42% and 30% energy usage respectively. Other sectors like cooling, lighting and refrigeration's fused energy ultilization was more than one-tenth, whereas other implements intaken 15% of energy
In contrast to its energy comsumption of less than a-fifth, other tools produce nearly double the amount (28%) of greenhouse gases. Gas discharge by refrigeration and lighting also increased two-fold to 8% and 14% compared with its energy intake of 4% and 7% accordingly. Cooling, on the other hand, produces only 3% of greenhouse gas. Surprisingly, emission of greenhouse gas by heatimg is significantly decline to 15% in comparision with its energy use which consist of a two- fold amount.
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to Increase the cost of fuel To what extent Do you agree or disagree 84
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 404, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'declined'.
Suggestion: declined
...enhouse gas by heatimg is significantly decline to 15% in comparision with its energy u...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59024390244 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16727766839 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575609756098 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5870079454 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.25 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 5.23603664747 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283963804183 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138767786986 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107826712887 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199910203697 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118972838778 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.