Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Some people think having classes on the Internet is good, while others think having classes with a teacher in the classroom is good.
Which one do you prefer and why?
Learning is a lifelong process that can benefit almost every member of society. Different people have different preferences when it comes to learning. I think learning online is better than in the traditional classroom setting.
First, online learning is more time-efficient than learning in classrooms. People today are always busy with heavy schedules pushing them to do many things every day, and online learning is convenient enough to fit into people’s busy schedules. For example, people can watch a course replay in the middle of the night or out in the jungle adventuring. This flexibility allows people to utilize small pockets of time here and there to make learning possible in their busy lives without investing large blocks of time, which a traditional classroom course would require. Moreover, people would spend much time commuting if they opt for conventional classroom teaching. Commuting can take hours, especially when their travel plan meets the peak hours, not to mention that sometimes traffic jams will make them risk failing to be punctual for their classes in addition to the extra time wasted in traffic.
Second, online learning provides an affordable education choice to many. Traditional education can be somewhat costly, which is evident in that many students pursue further education with the help of student loans. In other words, costs can be one of the most critical determinants in deciding if someone wants to learn something new formally. And this is why online learning is preferable compared to traditional classroom learning. With learners not confined to a particular geographic region, more customers can purchase the same course, potentially boosting the profit online courses can make. This handsome profit attracts more course providers to enter the industry, intensifying competition. As competition increases, online courses will inevitably become cheaper since all the competitors would not want their pricy products priced out of the market. But this is not true for traditional classes. Typically, institutions, such as primary schools or colleges, provide them to the locals. So, local people, particularly the juveniles, would not have many choices, allowing these institutions to be in a somewhat monopolized position, insensitive to adjusting the prices they charge to their customers.
To conclude, learning online is more efficient and affordable than in conventional classroom settings.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should make it possible for all children to attend preschool early childhood education programs for example for three year old children at no cost to the children s families 90
- Is job sharing good for workers Job sharing is a type of part time employment in which one position can be shared by two part time workers that is the two people share the work hours and pay of one job Job sharing opens more opportunities to people who ha 76
- Some people think classic movies or tv shows have greater value while others think new movies are more enjoyable Which one do you agree And why 64
- Teachers of young children at a primary school are considering making one major change to better support the educational and social development of their students aged 6 10 which one of the following changes do you think is the most important for the teach 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, for example, i think, in addition, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54666666667 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86108106996 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578666666667 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2252524653 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118215438339 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0356206219621 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035264509707 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730959627557 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317686615634 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.