Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Now-a-days everyone is aware of the environmental damage caused due to usage of packaging materials. While some people believe that it is the responsibility of the consumer to take an initiative in lessening of the packaging, there are others who believe that the amount of packaging should be reduced at the initial stage as in production and dealership stages.
On one hand, I believe that the manufacturers and dealers are responsible for the Excessive packaging of goods. One reason for this is that they want to ensure the hygiene and longevity of the goods. For example, the perishable goods like fruits are extensively packaged in order to maintain freshness. However, in the past, when packaging was not done in such a high scale, products and goods were still of good quality. The other reason being the ignorance of many people about the harmful effects of packaging materials being used. Manufacturers and supermarkets should always try to adopt to a recyclable, bio-degradable alternatives of packaging. For instance, they can use covers made from bamboo fibre to wrap the clothes in. There should be centralized policies in place to ensure the limitations of packaging of goods.
On the other hand, in today’s world, everything is based on the concept of demand and supply and hence customers play an equally significant role in the amount of packaging being done. If we as consumers prefer to buy products with less packaging, the supply of such materials will drastically reduce. Apart from this, the customers should ensure that they promote the usage of bio-degradable and reusable items. For example, in shops and malls, we see people asking for extra polythene covers to carry their purchased goods. Such situations can be easily avoided if people can just bring reusable jute bags from home.
In a nutshell, I firmly believe that both the parties are equally responsible for the production and usage of plastic in high scale. Each one of us and should join hands and spread awareness about the hazardous effects of the plastic packaging and the damage caused to the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | RkmsU | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart shows the average number of hours each day that Chinese American Turkish and Brazilian tourists spent doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August 2019 Summarise the information by 78
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city center from 2003 to 2012 100
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...s and supermarkets should always try to adopt to a recyclable, bio-degradable alternativ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, still, then, while, apart from, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09826589595 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83689623001 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514450867052 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3737693884 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.764705882 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264997705053 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796064346463 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497954506921 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153787882984 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048741168789 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...s and supermarkets should always try to adopt to a recyclable, bio-degradable alternativ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, still, then, while, apart from, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09826589595 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83689623001 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514450867052 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3737693884 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.764705882 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264997705053 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796064346463 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497954506921 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153787882984 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048741168789 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.