The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work.

The map illustrates the ground floor plan of a house that is expected to change.

Overall, it is noticeable that one internal wall and the storage under the stair were destroyed to link to the living room. However, both the entrance door and living room remain unchanged in the new plan.

In the new plan, one storage under the stair beside the internal wall that was put on the left of the living room was removed to expand the hall's area. At the same time, the internal door is proposed moved down to the bottom left of the main entrance. This helps customers move effortlessly from the living room to the kitchen. Meanwhile, stairs were re-built as well as extended in size at the old position of the internal door

Furthermore, there is kitchen furniture was added to the east of the map. Moreover, there are no changes shown in the living room and entrance room

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-05 vuhieuquy 56 view
2023-04-04 vuhieuquy 56 view
2023-02-22 Ho Mia 78 view
2022-09-24 jadenguyen 67 view
2022-09-24 jadenguyen 42 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'halls'' or 'hall's'?
Suggestion: halls'; hall's
...e living room was removed to expand the halls area. At the same time, the internal do...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62820512821 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33255833847 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6399286981 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102463142157 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595568579715 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.092931941919 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979172082727 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113453401239 0.0819641961636 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.