The line graph compares statistics on the percentage of joblessness in the age range 16 to 24 over a period of 20 years from 1993 in England.
It is clear that the proportion of unemployed young adults consistently overtook the proportion of the older age bracket over the period shown. However, both adult groups in London revealed overall figures higher than those in the rest of England.
In 1993, a modest 17% of English 16 to 24-year-olds living outside London were without work, and the data on those living inside London was 5% higher, at 22%. During the same period, the figure for the overall population in the capital, at 15%, compared to about 10% of those in the rest of England. Whereas there was a steady drop in levels of unemployment over the following 10 years, the 16-24 age profile saw a significant rise years later. It is noticeable that adults living outside the capital were by far the smallest rate as a whole.
By 2012, while young adults in London had climbed considerably and reached a peak of 20%, there had been a constant rise in the unemployment rates of this age group living in the rest of England since the 2002s, to nearly 21%. In contrast, people without work in the capital and the rest of the country had fallen to below 10%, approximately 9% and 8% respectively. Interestingly, the biggest gap between the two age groups in the rate of joblessness was clearly seen in London.
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
- The line graph compares the percentage of people in three countries who used the Internet between 1999 and 2009 84
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 92
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012 73
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.672 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6661012734 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2806067624 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231266169004 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861248390123 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503539442344 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13957656862 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427720455842 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.