The line graph gives information on the average price of the monthly payments for four different phone companies in a specific European country between January 2022 and September 2022, paid in euros.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the average price for Domo, Lex, Alpha grew up significantly. By contract, Sim TX plunged relatively over the period shown. In addition, the monthly price of the Alpha mobile phone company was the cheapest at the beginning. However, it went up dramatically and become the most expensive brand.
In January of 2022 the customers of Domo had to pay 15 euros to be able to use the Domo’s service, the highest fee. Meanwhile, the monthly bills for alpha company were the lowest, worth only 5 euros. From January to June, there was a relative stability in the price of Alpha company during the first 5 months before made a jump to become the highest cost of mobile phone brand. After having to pay the highest price most of the time mention Domo’s users witnessed a slight decrease to about 23 euros by September and ranked the second after Alpha. Starting at about 12 euros in January, Lex was the second highest company in comparison with other three, there was an upward trend to 18 euros in September. Despite a significant during the same period. During the first 6 months, the figure of Sim TX soared gradually and overtook Lex. After that, it reduced by just under the first point at the last month of period.
In conclusion, we can see that by the end of the documentation Alpha has the most expensive contract out of the other three, sitting at 25 euros. On the second place, we got Domo which is just slightly cheaper that Alpha at 24 euros after that is Lex having the contract cost around 17 euros and finally followed by Sim TX which has the cheapest contract out of the three and it’s around 8 euros per month.
- The line graph illustrates the amount of fruit production in 4 countries such as France Spain Germany Turkey between 1970 and 2010 71
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 82
- The charts show information about children learning musical instruments in 1996 and 2016 in the UK 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph gives information on the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...022 and September 2022, paid in euros. Overall, it can be clearly seen that the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rst point at the last month of period. In conclusion, we can see that by the en...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 965.302439024 159% => OK
No of words: 331.0 196.424390244 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64652567976 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40831550483 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504531722054 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 283.868780488 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3569095214 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.533333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2111160539 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692883974105 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779236774432 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156665614784 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865033235752 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.