Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people argue that governments should focus on improving railways compared to roads. In my opinion, I completely agree with this idea since it can have a lot of positive impacts on society as well as the environment.
By spending money more on railways and making them better, there may be a lot of benefits to people. Firstly, there will be fewer train accidents due to better rails, which can save a lot of passengers’ lives and make them feel they are secure. Secondly, better railways can contribute to the speed and comfort of trains, so people can travel to their destinations in a short time comfortably without sacrificing their precious time and feeling tired. Finally, enhancing railway conditions can guarantee that trains will be more punctual than ever before, which is a huge advantage to commuters, who need to go to their work in time.
In addition, putting more budgets on railways can reduce our carbon footprint and significantly lower human impacts on nature. Due to improved railways, people will rely on trains more as their favourite mode of public transport. Trains nowadays use sustainable electricity as their main source of fuel, releasing no greenhouse gases, in comparison with non-renewable fossil fuels used in cars and buses. Moreover, one train can carry a lot of passengers due to its carriages while we need a great number of cars and buses to carry the same amount of them, meaning that a considerably low amount of carbon will be emitted, which can have undeniable benefits to our planet.
In conclusion, owing to the great benefits to society and our mother nature, I fully believe that governments allocate more funds to railways rather than roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected personal relationships Has this become a positive or negative development 73
- The chart below shows what anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 87
- The two pie charts below show changes in world population by region between 1910 and 2010 Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features and make any relevant comparisons 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ilways, people will rely on trains more as their favourite mode of public transpor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02473498233 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75554491102 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590106007067 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4436515676 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.272727273 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4545454545 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122955578267 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559063931148 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051714401615 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975693895904 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561228527866 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.