It is a common belief that the fuel price for transport should be risen to address problems related to the environment. I would agree with this argument because the fuel burning vehicle causes several effects on the environment and increasing the price of fuel is an effective solution.
To begin with, cars and vehicles burning fuel pollute the quality of the environment. The carbon dioxide manufactured by those vehicles is the main reason for global warming as well as lung disease in humans. A study has shown that 1 out of 10 people gets lung cancer because of breathing polluted air on the road. Moreover, if the price of fuel still remains, the number of used cars can increase continuously. That would affect the quality of infrastructure as well as cause more traffic jams.
On top of that, increasing the fuel price would encourage people to use other vehicles which are more environmentally friendly. Instead of using private cars, people would choose public vehicles such as trains, and buses which are more cost-saving options. Besides, people may also prefer electronic cars rather than fuel burning ones. Many manufacturers change their strategy to produce more natural resources using vehicles. Take Vinfast company as an example. In recent years, it starts producing cars using solar energy instead of traditional cars.
In conclusion, I firmly support the idea that fuel costs should be increased to limit car consumption to protect the environment from negative effects and to encourage people to use alternative vehicles.
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to Increase the cost of fuel To what extent Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to Increase the cost of fuel To what extent Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to Increase the cost of fuel To what extent Do you agree or disagree 63
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to Increase the cost of fuel To what extent Do you agree or disagree 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.208 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7477991193 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3464465631 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174766961495 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600970352139 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047358440467 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11495774414 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216701664563 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.