the line chart of female members of parliament in European countries from 2000 to 2012. Summarise the information and Write at least 150 words.
A glance at the line graph provided reveals data about the proportion of female members of parliament in European countries between 2000 and 2012.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the percentage of females who were in parliament witnessed an ascending trend in all the countries. In addition, the ratio of female members of parliament in Italy was highest compared to other countries in 2012.
As can be seen in the graph, in comparison with the proportion of women members who took part in parliament in Germany which experienced a slight increase in the last 12 years, there was a significant rise in the percentage of female members in Italy who were in parliament, from just approximately 25% in 2000 to nearly 40% in 2012. Additionally, despite having a period of erratic behaviors in 8 years from 2000, the figure for France also increased to about 30% in the same time.
In terms of the percentage of women who joined in parliament in Belgium, it is evident that after having a dramatic climb to reach a peak at about 28% in 2004, the quantity in Belgium continued to increase gradually in the next 8 years. Lastly, starting at below 5% in 2000, the period of the next 12 years saw a significant increase of about 25% in the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-16 | Zhuyingdeng | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that the percentage of females who were in parliament witnessed an ascending tre...
^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...son with the proportion of women members who took part in parliament in Germany w...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 12 years, there was a significant rise in the percentage of female members in ...
^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a significant rise in the percentage of female members in Italy who were in parl...
^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ident that after having a dramatic climb to reach a peak at about 28% in 2004, th...
^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out 28% in 2004, the quantity in Belgium continued to increase gradually in the n...
^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rting at below 5% in 2000, the period of the next 12 years saw a significant incr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, lastly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66222222222 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73181168123 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515555555556 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.1551328984 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.857142857 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1428571429 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284514982227 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145862112265 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105876220572 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204386925853 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10414286205 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.