Society today is marked by several technological advancements that have made considerable changes in the lifestyle of people. While some people argue that these have led to unhealthy lifestyles devoid of any physical activity, others are more proactive in highlighting their benefits. In my opinion, I agree that young people in my country have better lives compared to their parents, primarily because they did not have access to such revolutionary technology. In the subsequent paragraphs, I would like to explore two main reasons to support my view.
First of all, our parents did not have access to mobile phones that have become ubiquitous today. Communication itself was difficult and people had to travel several kilometres to send out a message. Additionally, transport systems were also not well developed during that time. With the advent of technology, most youngsters today own hand-held devices which help them not only navigate through unknown places but also helps them maintain contact with their family almost all the time. Drawing from personal experience, I have heard stories where my father had to travel more than ten kilometres to his school, on a bicycle. Proliferation of software systems coupled with advanced hardware have led to development of app-cab facilities which have become a major transport facility today. Such facilities were not available to our parents.
Furthermore, internet as we know it today, was not prevalent during our parents’ time. Youngsters today are drawn towards social media and are significantly aware of the geopolitical changes happening around the globe. Thus, information through internet has transcended across national boundaries. This is in direct contrast to how information reached our previous generations. Earlier, key national developments were prioritised through state-sponsored media and as such global news were broadcasted selectively. Hence, compared to our parents, youngsters today are more empowered with knowledge of events occurring both globally and nationally and can freely share their opinions on these through the world-wide web.
Arguably, opinions related to how technology has led to an unhealthy lifestyle devoid of physical activity is subjective. It is true that the ease at which things can be done today in my country, is something which was considered impossible by our predecessors. Hence, physical rigour was a key part of their lives. However, even today motivated individuals participate in healthy lifestyle practices and routine physical exercise often with technological aid to monitor key health parameters such as heart-beat.
In conclusion, my agreement to the statement that in my country, young people have better lives compared to their parents is closely related to the technological advances that have occurred over the past few decades. Technological advances in communications and transport infrastructure development coupled with the proliferation of internet are two main reasons on which my opinion rests.
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 80
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage about deforestation 3
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 16
- Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term we urge all of our clients to invest in this new company For the first time in ten years A company that has developed satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with the current 66
- 62 The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2569.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60917030568 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06444839998 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548034934498 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 817.2 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7911718439 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.695652174 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9130434783 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95652173913 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277246295932 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706250600283 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760218076839 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157991656033 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774222801949 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 58.1214874552 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.