Nowadays, with rapid globalization ongoing, the masses are enabled to take advantage of manifold recreational products to unwind themselves. Whenever people are choosing movies and TV programs to watch, a general controversy arises. Some people advocate that domestic movies and TV shows are more appealing to the public than those made by foreign countries. As far as I am concerned, I hardly concur with this idea and believe foreign movies and TV programs are as interesting as domestic ones. What I believe can be substantiated as follows.
On the one hand, watching foreign movies and TV programs is a blessed opportunity for us to broaden our horizons and enjoy recreations of higher quality with ease. We can not only learn the exotic culture but also have a more comprehensive understanding of alien countries by watching their amusement products. Sometimes we can even have a better recreational experience since some countries have more cutting-edge technologies, more mature production systems, and more tactfully-designed visual effects added to videos. Take me as a prime example of this point. When I was a juvenile, I started to watch the series movies of Harry Potter. I was totally indulged in these movies. The plots are attractive, and the characters are impressive. Some three-dimension special effects that my country was not able to generate also caught my eye. I really enjoyed watching these movies and experiencing the "culture shocks". In addition, in this way, I grasped a clear view of British traditional literature and legends as well.
On the other hand, it is enjoyable for people to watch domestic movies and TV shows owing to the same cultural background. Since we are more familiar with our own culture than foreign ones, we can avoid some embarrassing circumstances when it is enormously demanding for us to understand foreign slang and can put our feet into the hero’s shoes when we are watching movies or operas with ease. Besides, it is also interesting to learn some local dialects in different regions of our motherland. For example, people in China always watch Xiaopin, a kind of verbal entertainment in the Spring Festival Gala. Almost all of the actors and actresses come from the Northeast Region of China. Their behaviors are very funny and can make the audience laugh for a long time. Since we are all born in China, we can readily comprehend some laugh spots in their dialogues and actions, and we enjoy their unique dialects as well.
In a nutshell, it is too rash to label any kind of entertainment as the more intriguing option. Both foreign and domestic recreational products can attract audiences and improve their happiness in diversified ways.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Educating young people about healthy food is important and should not be the job of families alone it should also be the responsibility of schools to teach their students about healthy eating 82
- Out of the following three things which one would you prefer to regulate in order to improve your health the kind of food you eat the amount of exercise the amount of stress in your life 80
- Imagine that you have been given the opportunity to advise the government of a city or region area that you are familiar with to spend more money on ONE thing to benefit the city or region Which ONE of these do you believe would be the most beneficial for 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and TV programs made in one s own country are more interesting than those made in other countries 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should be paid according to how well their students perform 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 614, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ent in the Spring Festival Gala. Almost all of the actors and actresses come from the Nort...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, really, so, well, as to, for example, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2277.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12837837838 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0099082583 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8236693831 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.875 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.20833333333 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197646571627 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048813662549 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584163166333 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115747099667 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753854319051 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.