The author in the reading passage argues how a mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek with reduced wages can be beneficial for the company, the nation, and for individual employees as well. The speaker in the listening, however, attacks each of the arguments made by the author in the reading, stating that neither the company nor the individual employees would benefit from such a policy.
First of all, the author in the reading states that since employees would spend less time working, they would be more rested and alert. Hence the number of costly errors in their work would decrease and this would lead to an increase in the company profits. On top of that, because those opting for the four-day work week would be paid at a reduced rate, the same amount of money can be used for staffing. The speaker in the listening contends this argument stating that there are fixed costs associated with new employees such as medical benefits, office space and computers, and on the job training which might cause a decrease in the profits.
Secondly, while the author in the reading believes that a four-day work week will significantly reduce unemployment rates, the speaker in the listening states that because hiring is costly, companies might simply ask their employees to work overtime. Additionally, the speaker in the listening believes that this might lead to raised expectations. This could cause the employees to be subjected to an unpleasant work week where they try to achieve results similar to those who work five days a week.
Finally, the author in the reading believes that a four-day work week would be better for individual employees as well, as they could spend the additional free time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure activities. Although the speaker in the listening agrees that the four-day work week would lead to more free time for employees, he doubts that it can have other risks which can reduce the overall quality of life. He believes that employees opting for four-day workweek might have decreased job stability and can lose out on their jobs during economic downtimes. Furthermore, these employees might get passed over for promotion, because companies would like to have someone who works five days a week, in the managerial position, for continuous coverage and supervision.
To sum up, as in evident from this essay, the speaker in the listening and the author in the reading hold very different opinion on the mandatory company policy regarding a four-day work week
- Marco Polo 73
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 80
- Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term we urge all of our clients to invest in this new company For the first time in ten years A company that has developed satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with the current 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 75
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas trends and concepts that help explain those facts Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reason 66
No. of Words: 430 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 430 250
No. of Characters: 2129 1200
No. of Different Words: 190 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.554 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.951 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.474 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 156 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 123 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.535 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.455 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.455 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.184 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4