Sun Beem
The author claims Sun-Beem Facial Cleanser should institute a huge publicity campaign that would assist them in the launch of Sun-Beem's improved formula. The author believes that an enormous media blitz that includes television, radio, internet, and magazine ads about Sun-Beem's new, non-carcinogenic formula, would help to spread awareness about their product among potential new customers and also their previous customers. The author's claims is not well-seasoned, as it believes that doing publicity about their new launch would help attract new customers and spread awareness among their existing customers.
At first, the author claims that a publicity campaign that would assist them in the launch of Sun-Beems improved formula would attract new customers and builds trust among their existing customers is flawed. If the product is good and not corrupted by any means of adulteration, then customers would happily purchase its product and these existing customers would spread good words about this product among other people, and this would help the company attract new customers.
Further, the author believes that, doing a publicity campaign would help combat negative publicity of the old product. This claim of the author is vague because, if the company itself knows that its old product is deficient and unworthy of being sold, then why did it in the first place made a thought of selling the product to its customers, as this has built a negative perspective about the product among is customers and the customers would not like to purchase the product again.
To summarise the author's claim that, a huge publicity campaign that would assist them in the launch of Sun-Beem's improved formula is flawed. I believe that the argument would improve vastly if Sun-Beem company focuses more on providing quality products to customers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-06 | ZAINBM | 50 | view |
| 2020-09-20 | mail2kavya | 59 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 33
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in wh 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people s behaviour What is your opin 61
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest 73
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mers and also their previous customers. The authors claims is not well-seasoned, as...
^^^
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'claim'.
Suggestion: claim
...o their previous customers. The authors claims is not well-seasoned, as it believes th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, well, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 291.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36426116838 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5804150941 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 204.123752495 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422680412371 0.468620217663 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.230586674 57.8364921388 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.444444444 119.503703932 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 23.324526521 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.70786347227 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204750033929 0.218282227539 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150104180523 0.0743258471296 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155336237403 0.0701772020484 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173842488328 0.128457276422 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133827369871 0.0628817314937 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 14.3799401198 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.3550499002 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.5979740519 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mers and also their previous customers. The authors claims is not well-seasoned, as...
^^^
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'claim'.
Suggestion: claim
...o their previous customers. The authors claims is not well-seasoned, as it believes th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, well, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 291.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36426116838 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5804150941 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 204.123752495 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422680412371 0.468620217663 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.230586674 57.8364921388 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.444444444 119.503703932 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 23.324526521 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.70786347227 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204750033929 0.218282227539 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150104180523 0.0743258471296 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155336237403 0.0701772020484 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173842488328 0.128457276422 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133827369871 0.0628817314937 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 14.3799401198 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.3550499002 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.5979740519 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 12.3882235529 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.