Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid sabbatical time, believing this benefits the individual and the organization. Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it. Consider the possible arguments for and against unpaid sabbatical leave, and reach a viewpoint of your own.
Among the modern employees, whether to have an unpaid sabbatical leave or not is a burning question. A fine percentage of workforces believe it is a worthy development while others say it's a suicidal approach. This essay will analyze both viewpoints as having more free time from work can improve efficiency as a prime benefit followed by the possibility to lose valuable employees as a flaw which is far more superior.
Nowadays many managers tend to grant unpaid sabbatical time. Hence, this allows the workers to pursue their hobbies, take a course on their particular interest, learn or improve skills that they need to acquire, and so on. Moreover, these activities help them to avoid their daily routine which they feel is pretty boring. In addition, a change of mind also results in increasing commitment when they return. Thus, enhancing the productivity of the companies as well. Research by the students of "Khulna University" proved that "A change of daily mindset increases motivation heavily. Therefore, workers work exhibit more creativity after returning from a leave"
However, the nonpaid sabbaticals may also generate vital concerns. A high proportion of employees do not enjoy their job and can't resign from them. Otherwise, they will not be able to pay their monthly expenses. Hence, they have caged themselves in a circle of disenchantment. As a result, leaves like this may be a luxury for them. If a company forces it on them, they will tend to switch where they might find paid holidays. This scenario may result in the loss of major assets of a company. For instance, an article in "Business times" demonstrates that about 75% of employees switch industries so that they can find appropriate holiday schemes. Therefore, it is clear that managers should avoid this trend unless they might lose pivotal man forces.
To sum up, even though the particular trend has a recreational value which may establish strong possibilities to generate precious revenue for the Industry, the chances of losing core participants evident a greater risk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The table below shows the percentage of the population and the types of houses they live in 3 areas of a city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The line graph below shows the land used for organic crops in two countries between 1985 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine Government funding should reflect this To what extend do you agree 84
- The table below shows the expenses per week of a retired single person and a couple in Australia for their comfortable lifestyle Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...s a worthy development while others say its a suicidal approach. This essay will an...
^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...of employees do not enjoy their job and cant resign from them. Otherwise, they will ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23442136499 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.921557503 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626112759644 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3014358711 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8421052632 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7368421053 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16482212903 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481233837535 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366232401841 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946941802126 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374905452228 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.