Some think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Why do people spend a hefty amount of money on renovating old buildings? Should they be replaced with new ones? Which plan is the best? These are the questions that many have been bombarded with for several years. Although it is opined by some that modernizing old structures are utterly absurd, it will be proven by this essay that this may not be the case. In other words, renovation not only can bring environmental benefits, but make house prices more affordable to a great extent. Throughout the following paragraphs, these points of paramount importance will be taken into account to rationally advocate the latter logical standpoint.
Should people start constructing new buildings rather than restoring the old ones, the used materials become useless, leading to the environment pollution, for one. Take Tehran a megacity in Iran where many eagerly tend to build a newly-built home, as an illustration. By doing so, the old buildings’ bricks, iron, and plastics have ended up to landfills, massively contributing to contamination. It is, therefore, exemplified by this glaringly apparent instance that the more renovation the old buildings, the more protection the nature.
More significantly, nowadays, due to the high inflation rate, buying a modern home is not affordable; as a result, repairing old places will be a great policy to make it possible for everyone to buy a shelter. In Toronto, a cosmopolitan city in Canada, most of people can afford to purchase a house since most of them are rebuilt and renewed, to illustrate. Doing so, not only many have their own privacy, but they can change their house for a large size in the near future. By shedding light on this example, it is, thus, crystal clear that individuals can fulfill their dreams of becoming house owners through the old building renovation program.
To recapitulate, after careful situational analysis, repairing the existing buildings can be an environmentally friendly activity. Besides that, it will enable residents to experience the feeling of home ownership owing to their affordability. Based on the aforementioned compelling ground, it is, hence, hoped these preponderant points will be taken into account by constructors the world over, especially in densely populated areas.
- Some think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development while others believe they are dangerous and negatively affect society Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Many people today would argue that cinemas are becoming irrelevant due to new streaming services To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Nowadays most green energy is becoming ever more prevalent in both developed and developing countries Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment others believe they are a serious threat to energy security Discuss both views an 89
- You are a student at an English language school in Brighton and are living in private accommodation with other flat mates You have not had hot water or heating for some time The landlord s workmen have tried to fix the problem but without success Write a 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...Toronto, a cosmopolitan city in Canada, most of people can afford to purchase a house since mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, as a result, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29834254144 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02822412093 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602209944751 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6735296795 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221288571998 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678167861275 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671174652871 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134814442968 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592943778145 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...Toronto, a cosmopolitan city in Canada, most of people can afford to purchase a house since mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, may, so, therefore, thus, as a result, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29834254144 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02822412093 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602209944751 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6735296795 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221288571998 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678167861275 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671174652871 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134814442968 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592943778145 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.