Question :Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Most people in the world believe that daily team-based communication is better in person rather than through e-mail. In my perspective, conveying information through e-mail is more beneficial for professional and educational teamwork. I have two reasons to support my notion, which I explore in the following essay.
To begin with, information transformation through e-mail provides the opportunity for all the members to receive everything precisely with details without any fault. By doing so, we can avoid misunderstandings in the process and run the project more smoothly. The more easier and shorter the communications become, the more energy will be spent on the quality of the project. My personal experience during the COVID-19 quarantine is compelling evidence of his issue. When the restrictions started, my colleagues and I were nervous about the future and how we should communicate to develop our projects while we work remotely. But, after a few months of online communication and getting accustomed to the situation, we were all satisfied with our results. Surprisingly, even now that the pandemic is over, we, besides our boss, feel that this approach this more profitable not just for the company and its projects but also for the employees due to the fact the rate of mistakes and flaws has declined dramatically. If we had not experienced the quarantine during the pandemic, we would not have come to the idea that our process is more efficient through e-mail.
Secondly, by conveying data through e-mail in a professional environment, project management becomes more straightforward than in the past. Furthermore, no one will miss small detail by having a record of all the transmitted information and files. Additionally, it does not have the detrimental effects and repercussions of oral communication. Taking my aforementioned experience into account, we used to experience a lot of hinders in the design process in our firm because of misconceptions in daily conversations. By the time we started to work remotely, our productivity had increased significantly, and the internet eliminated the chance of the everyday mistakes that used to slow us down. If we were not forced to work through e-mail, we could not have been able to increase our team's speed.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that communication through e-mail has enormous positive and profound impacts on a group project. This is because it not only boosts the efficiency of the working process but also increases their speed by inhibiting the chance of misconception in daily conversations.
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples 76
- TPO 52 Integrated Writing Task Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Directions You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage Typicall 3
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One can learn about another person from the books and movies that the person likes 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
... and run the project more smoothly. The more easier and shorter the communications become, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 412.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27427184466 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24606227659 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546116504854 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4790271739 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.368421053 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94736842105 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195589932105 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062284275387 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392016253459 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120063951295 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373391089606 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.