Question: Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
It is always crucial for people that refrain from saying something wrong in their speeches. I think that if someone says something wrong in a classroom or a meeting, he or she should be corrected by others as soon as possible. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in this essay.
To begin with, teachers or leaders try to make as few mistakes as possible while speaking or teaching. However, they can not prevent making mistakes all the time. Interrupting teachers and correcting their errors during class help students learn the right information and not make more mistakes in the future. In addition, the teachers understand their mistakes and will not repeat them in the next classes. For example, when I was a senior student in high school, my history tutor made the mistake of introducing the first king of the United Kingdom. At that time, I interrupted her and told the correct name of the king. The teacher appreciated me, and all the students were not confused by the incorrect data. If I had not told anybody about that mistake, all the students would have learned the wrong information about the king.
Furthermore, when we correct leaders or teachers when they are saying something wrong, we seem more curious and intelligent than others. In addition, the teacher thinks that we are interested in that subject, and they even get more enthusiastic about teaching more relevant information to the class. It is also the same for leaders. They can identify people with more knowledge and abilities among those who are listening to them. For instance, in a meeting I participated in last year, the leader gave some misinformation about the country, and I suddenly corrected him. After the meeting, he called me and asked if I would work as his assistant. That was a great chance to expand my experience and learn new skills.
In conclusion, although some people believe it is more beneficial to correct teachers' or leaders' mistakes after their talk or never, I think it is better to correct them instantly. Because fewer people get incorrect information, and smarter people will be introduced to them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-02 | mina_sharifi | 73 | view |
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 80
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The table shows the proportion of monthly household income that five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 7.30242825607 260% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 22.412803532 219% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 362.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90331491713 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68017450332 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 3.25607064018 399% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.527689777 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.75 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195694775068 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556606254055 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470436097701 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112622270869 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017481944211 0.0443174109184 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.