Imagine that people in your community have been asked to decide how to spend public money over the next year.
One option for spending the money is to modernize and expand a public library.
The other option is to renovate a bus station and increase the number of bus lines that connect the community with other areas.
Which of the two options would you support and why?
Priority should be given to projects that would result in the modernization and extension of public libraries when allocating public funds locally. My conviction that this is the case is supported by a variety of distinct considerations.
A public library is an essential community resource because it provides citizens of all ages with access to information, educational opportunities, and enjoyable activities. If the library were brought up to date and given additional room, a higher number of users would be able to access the current amenities and make use of the available resources and services. This may include adding new books, periodicals, and multimedia products to the library, as well as modernizing the equipment and facilities to make the library more user-friendly and accessible.
Second, there is the potential for public library investments to yield long-term community benefits. For instance, a modern and well-stocked library can serve as a hub for lifelong learning and personal development. This can aid people in attaining their full potential and contribute to the general health and happiness of the community. In addition, a library can function as a gathering space where people can engage in cultural, social, and civic activities. These types of activities can help to the growth of a sense of community and belonging.
Thirdly, renovating an existing bus station and increasing the number of bus routes could provide some immediate benefits, such as increasing the number of modes of transportation available to residents and companies and promoting greater connectivity between the two groups. Alternatively, the potential benefits of this approach are likely to be less broad and shorter-term than those of rebuilding and expanding a public library. For instance, while extending and renovating the library is more likely to have a lasting impact on education, personal development, and the expansion of the community, modernizing the local bus station may make it easier for people to commute to the town.
In conclusion, I believe that the best method for a community to invest publicly funded funds would be to refurbish and expand its current public library. Investing in a public library has the potential to yield long-term educational, personal development, and community-building benefits for the community. However, investing in a public library has the potential to give these benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-07 | cocoza@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | cocoza@gmail.com | 65 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Online classes in which you communicate with your professors and other students only by computer offer more advantages and benefits to students than traditional classes on a college campus 86
- Imagine that people in your community have been asked to decide how to spend public money over the next year One option for spending the money is to modernize and expand a public library The other option is to renovate a bus station and increase the numbe 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People are happier when they give away extra money to charity or a good cause rather than when they spend it on themselves 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, third, thirdly, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48806366048 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20431868798 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519893899204 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.272619804 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.3125 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5625 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229543876764 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786227092833 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483876253039 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131424375684 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422639797895 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.